Tag Archives: renewable energy

Offshore Breezes

Credit: Aaron Crowe/flickr

The Long Island Power Authority (LIPA) last week approved the construction of the largest offshore wind farm in the U. S. It will be located 30 miles southeast of Montauk at the eastern tip of Long Island. Construction is supposed to begin in 2020 and the plant is scheduled to go online by the end of 2022.

The farm will initially contain 15 turbines, and is located on a 256 square mile plot with room for as many as 200 turbines. Each turbine will be approximately 600 feet tall and the farm will be connected to East Hampton by a 50 mile undersea cable. It should generate enough energy to power 50,000 homes.

The wind farm will not be visible from Montauk, but will be barely visible from Martha’s Vineyard. Previous wind farms have been opposed by property owners who said they would spoil the ocean view. The only opposition to the current project came from commercial fishermen and consumers concerned about rising electricity costs.

At present, the nation’s only functioning offshore wind farm is the Block Island Wind Farm off the coast of Rhode Island, which went online six weeks ago. The Long Island installation will be triple its size.

The wind farm is consistent with New York Governor Andrew Cuomo’s stated goal of drawing 50% of the state’s power from renewable sources by 2030. Investment tax credits are expected to offset 24% of the wind farm’s cost. The cost of the farm was originally put at $1 billion, but has been revised to $740 million due to reductions in the cost of wind power. LIPA estimates its eventual cost to consumers at 16 cents per kilowatt hour. This compares unfavorably to the current cost of electricity from fossil fuels (7.5 cents per kilowatt hour), but these costs are likely to change.

Due to higher construction costs, offshore wind farms cost about twice as much as onshore farms of the same size. However, offshore wind farms are more productive, since the wind blows more reliably the further offshore you go, and they face less opposition from competing users of the space.

Europe is the world leader in offshore wind power, with the U. K., Denmark, Belgium and Germany having the largest capacity (in that order). The cost of offshore wind power in Europe has fallen by 32% since 2012, and is considerably less than in the U. S. This is attributable primarily to the fact that more of the costs of development are borne by European governments. In Europe, the state covers more of the cost of preparatory work and builds the grid connection.

You may also be interested in reading:

The Public Wants Renewables

China Gets Smart While We Get Stupid

Cheap Solar Changes Everything

The Public Wants Renewables

As President Trump (gulp!) signed executive orders reviving the Keystone XL oil pipeline and expediting the Dakota Access pipeline, the Pew Research Center this week released the results of a survey of attitudes toward energy development priorities. The survey was conducted on January 4-9 with a representative sample of 1502 U. S. adults.

Respondents were asked: “Which one of the following do you think should be the more important priority for addressing America’s energy supply?” Here are the results:

The percentage choosing renewables was up from 60% the last time the question was asked, in December 2014.

There continues to be a large divide between Democrats and Republicans on this issue, as shown below. However, it should be noted that there was a virtual tie among Republican and Republican-leaning respondents, with 45% choosing renewable energy and 44% choosing fossil fuels.

The other demographic that produced large differences was age, as shown here:

While Trump plans to weaken the power of the Environmental Protection Agency, a Pew survey conducted between November 30 and December 5 found that 59% of U. S. adults say stricter environmental laws and regulations are worth the cost, while 34% say they cost too many jobs and hurt the economy.

It should be noted that attitudes toward renewable energy are much less polarized than attitudes toward climate change, where 88% of Democrats and Democrat leaners see climate change as a major threat to our well-being, compared to only 12% of Republicans and Republican leaners. This could mean that Americans have decided that investing in renewable energy would be a good idea even if the climate were not changing.

Imagine how many Americans would favor expansion of wind and solar energy if the corporate media were to present accurate information about the costs of alternative forms of energy.

You May also be interested in reading:

China Gets Smart While We Get Stupid

Cheap Solar Changes Everything

The Cost of Climate Inaction

China Gets Smart While We Get Stupid

China announced last week that it is planning to invest $361 billion in renewable energy development during the 5-year period between 2016 and 2020. The breakdown is as follows: 40% will go to solar power, 28% to wind, 20% to hydro, and the remainder to tidal, geothermal and biomass. The plan is expected to create 13 million new clean energy jobs. It puts China on schedule to meet its greenhouse gas reduction goals from the 2014 U. S.-China treaty five years ahead of time.

Even so, China’s situation illustrates the heavy role that inertia plays in energy consumption. By 2020, renewables are expected to account for only 15% of its total energy, with coal still acounting for more than half.

Offshore wind farm near Shanghai, China.

China’s heavy reliance on coal has exacted serious economic and social costs due to hazardous smog. Last year, as part of their “war on pollution,” the government closed 335 factories and retired 400,000 high-polluting vehicles from the roads. This is starting to pay off, since last year Beijing reported having 198 “blue sky days,” up from just 12 in 2015.

China’s new investments will make it the world’s dominant producer of renewable energy. They now have five of the six largest manufacturers of solar panels, the largest manufacturer of wind turbines, and the largest producer of lithium ion batteries. The Chinese have also proposed a plan for an international green energy grid, with companies from Japan, Russia and South Korea scheduled to participate. The grid is based on the principle that, although sunshine and wind are intermittent at any one place, with a large enough grid, energy can be transfered one location to another to meet everyone’s needs.

Meanwhile, the U. S. is planning to continue to ignore both climate science and economic reality by increasing our reliance on fossil fuels, even as the President-elect makes blatantly false statements about renewable energy.

You may also be interested in reading:

Cheaper Solar Changes Everything

Community Solar

The Way of Ta’u